A glance at the provided bar chart illustrates the comparation of the snow depth (cm) in several ski resort in Canada on average in three different years by month from November to April. In general, it is clearly apparent that in the three years compared, the snow depth was higher in February to April.
Looking in more detail from the charts, although there was an increase in the deep downwards of the snow from November to January, the profundity of the snow reported only at near 80 cm to 180 cm which reached the thinnest in year two and the thickest in year three. On the other hand, in the last three months, the depth of the snow dramatically rose at the range of 300 cm to 470 cm. Interestingly, the profile of snow deepness in February and March were similar which reach around 450 cm, 400 cm, and 350 cm in year one, year two, and year three, respectively. However in April, the deepest snow captured in year two at 470 cm while the thinnest was noted in year three at 300 cm.
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 56
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 78
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...year two, and year three, respectively. However in April, the deepest snow captured in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38043478261 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42532616246 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8753705839 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427123453537 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24848988584 0.103423049105 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053089767346 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361010472316 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306524627062 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.