The chart shows the distribution of money spent on music in three different years in Northern IRELAND. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts compare the percentage of money is expenditure on music across different music sectors in Northern Ireland in the years 2005, 2008, and 2011. For four of the sectors, it is evident that over the time frame there was significant change in their proportion of music.
At 61%, we can see that the CD sector accounted for the majority of money spend in 2005, but this percentage had dropped to 41% and 26% by 2011. Across the same three- year period, as an increasing number of people chose to purchase digital download we can see that distribution of money went from just 6% to 25% and 43 by 2011, making it the music sectors with the highest overall contributed money.
In 2005, the concert boasted an impressive 31% of total spent money in Northern Ireland. However, by 2011 the figure had fallen considerably to 28%. Interestingly, other sources eventually constant across the three year it just (2%) and (3%) respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | davinderkaur | 89 | view |
- The chart shows the distribution of money spent on music in three different years in Northern IRELAND Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In recent years, more and more people choosing to read e books rather than paper books do the advantageous outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In recent years, more and more people choosing to read e books rather than paper books do the advantageous outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83435582822 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65578279987 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0748401157 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236551075805 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104202711796 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943593692986 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164071481893 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455009936777 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.