The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain
The chart provides information about the amount of time that male and female spend on household tasks in the UK. All figure were measured by minutes per person per day.
Overall, It is clear that female tended to spend a lot of time on household tasks while the number of male was far lower.
Among females, the amount of minute they spent on cooking baking, washing up was 74 minutes, this is the task which taken females the most of time. Exactly 58 minutes, 45 minutes and 25 minutes of day, female spend to do cleaning, house tidying, care of their own children and clothes washing, ironing, sewing respectively. However, they just spent about 21 minutes and 9.5 minutes for gardening, pet care and maintenance odd jobs respectively.
On the other hand, males spend less time in household jobs than females. They seem to be spent many time at Gardening, petcare or maintenance odd jobs, the figure was 49.5 minutes and 26 minutes respectively. In contrast, males rarely spend time in cooking baking, washing up, clearning house, care for their children and especially clothes washing, ironing, sewing. The number of those works were only 30 minutes, 13 minutes, 20 minutes and exactly 2 minutes respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 87
- Living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Advertisement Writing Task 2 An increasing number of advertisements on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertising Should television advertising be controlled 88
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat ina European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...obs than females. They seem to be spent many time at Gardening, petcare or maintenance od...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94146341463 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5433306188 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8396326043 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678370672614 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387314981311 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586614705022 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067358533263 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487082259642 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.