The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the patterns of domestic expenditures between Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Overall, in both countries, Food, housing and other goods and services held the largest part of the total expenditures whereas expenditure on health care was the lowest subject.
In Malaysia, 34% of housing was used, which was much higher than that in Japan, at 21 %. While other goods and services in Japan took up the lion's share of the total expenditures, at 29%, this was slightly more than in Malaysia. In term of food, the figures for both countries were approximately similar, at 27% and 24% for Japan and Malaysia, respectively.
The proportion of Health care in Japan was doubled than that in Malaysia, 6% compared to 3%. The figure for transport in Malaysia was half of that for Japan, 10% compared to 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | Tee Dos | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-17 | Lương Hữu Nam | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | vongocson | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-17 | ramchowdary.jujala336@gmail.com | view |
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that computers and the Internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. Write at least 150 words 56
- price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, andcarbonated drinks The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables,sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information b 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan andMalaysia in the year 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 687.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66726688511 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.248836713 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161165424225 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959890246595 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870588219669 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132393192346 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102478322948 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.