The chart shows the GPD growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010
The chart illustrates the GPD growth per year for Tunisia,Japan and Ecuador in the years 2007 and 2010.
Overall, to begin the figure for Tunisia was the highest, then gradual decreased.First of all for Japan the figure was smallest next threefild increased.By the year the figure for Ecuador downward trend,then increased.The end was decreased.
Tunisia divorse rate was about 6,3 persentages in 2007, being higher than Janans and Ecuadors rate by approximately 4,3 persenteges(Japan) and 3,2 %(Ecuador).Then, it decreased 4,5% in 2008(Tunisia).
Howerer the figure showed gradual decreased to about 3,1% in 2009 and contined end of the period was 3% in 2010.
Persenteges of divorse in Japan was two persentages in 2007 and it increased in 2008 for nearly 4,1%.The nexttwo year the figure Japan gradual increased and was 6,5% in 2010.Firstly the figure was 3,1% Ecuador in 2007,then three rtimes gradual decreased next two years.In 2008 was 5%,then decreased nearly 1,2%.Finally the figure Ecuador was about 2%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Japan
...ates the GPD growth per year for Tunisia,Japan and Ecuador in the years 2007 and 2010...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r Tunisia,Japan and Ecuador in the years 2007 and 2010. Overall, to begin the fi...
^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...was the highest, then gradual decreased.First of all for Japan the figure was smalles...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the smallest'.
Suggestion: was the smallest
...eased.First of all for Japan the figure was smallest next threefild increased.By the year th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...e was smallest next threefild increased.By the year the figure for Ecuador downwar...
^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...ar the figure for Ecuador downward trend,then increased.The end was decreased. Tunis...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...r Ecuador downward trend,then increased.The end was decreased. Tunisia divorse rat...
^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...y 4,3 persentegesJapan and 3,2 %Ecuador.Then, it decreased 4,5% in 2008Tunisia. How...
^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nd it increased in 2008 for nearly 4,1%.The nexttwo year the figure Japan gradual i...
^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
... gradual increased and was 6,5% in 2010.Firstly the figure was 3,1% Ecuador in 2007,the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...rtimes gradual decreased next two years.In 2008 was 5%,then decreased nearly 1,2%....
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
... 2008 was 5%,then decreased nearly 1,2%.Finally the figure Ecuador was about 2%
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... 2008 was 5%,then decreased nearly 1,2%.Finally the figure Ecuador was about 2%
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09381546923 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6739212784 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.4 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212363344163 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166633014826 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178051335941 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166633014826 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178051335941 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.