The bar chart depicts the frequency of American people consumed instant food in restaurants over a decade from 2003 until 2013.
It is clear that majority of American in both 2003 and 2006 ate in fast food restaurants once a week while in 2013, people in the USA, mainly, consumed junk food once or twice a month.
In 2003, most people feed fast food weekly for approximately 31% and reached the peak at around 34% in 2006. This pattern followed by people who consumed it for several times a week accounted for nearly 17% and 20% in 2003 and 2006.
Interestingly, people who ate junk food once or twice a month fluctuated and reached the highest in 2013 with around 34%.
The consumption of junk food for a few times a year rose by about 3% in 2006 compared with 2003 and remained steady in 2013 in 2013 with 15%. In contrast, the frequency of people who feed junk food every day and never had the same pattern. Both of them declined in 2006 and remained stable in 2013, below 5%.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- A government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e same pattern. Both of them declined in 2006 and remained stable in 2013, below ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4861878453 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33559901106 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3398707719 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333967265877 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156998371723 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901668392033 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209726978114 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731839128762 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.