The bar chart depicts the frequency of American people consumed instant food in restaurants over a decade from 2003 until 2013.
It is clear that majority of American in both 2003 and 2006 ate in fast food restaurants once a week while in 2013, people in the USA, mainly, consumed junk food once or twice a month.
In 2003, most people feed fast food weekly for approximately 31% and reached the peak at around 34% in 2006. This pattern followed by people who consumed it for several times a week accounted for nearly 17% and 20% in 2003 and 2006.
Interestingly, people who ate junk food once or twice a month fluctuated and reached the highest in 2013 with around 34%.
The consumption of junk food for a few times a year rose by about 3% in 2006 compared with 2003 and remained steady in 2013 in 2013 with 15%. In contrast, the frequency of people who feed junk food every day and never had the same pattern. Both of them declined in 2006 and remained stable in 2013, below 5%.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e same pattern. Both of them declined in 2006 and remained stable in 2013, below ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4861878453 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33559901106 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3398707719 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333967265877 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156998371723 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901668392033 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209726978114 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731839128762 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.