The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart below illustrates that the habitat of eating in fast food restaurants in the USA between 2003 and 2013.
It is explicit that a trend of eating fast food altered quite closely resemble among frequencies. Most Americans ate fast food moderately, while percentage never ate or ate daily fundamental remained low.
First, two frequencies had no large discrepancy which were “several times a week” and “a few times a year”. To be more precise, it figured out 17% in 2013, 16% in 2013 and the highest of this item belonged to 2006 with 20%. At the same time, in “a few times a year” item was under 15% in 2013 but acquired the same 15% in 2006 and 2013.
Secondly, the biggest frequencies were “once a week” and “once or twice a month”. Specifically, in 2006 the percentage indicated the number of people ate fast food once a week achieved the highest equivalent 33%. Similarly, 33% was also the surge scale which perceived the frequency “once or twice a month”.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give r 61
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continuous throughout life. 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96481986663 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 11.1333111554 43.030603864 26% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218258539434 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113941577071 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135192281418 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19103367997 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15872538783 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.