Given is a bar chart concerning the summary of information about the popularity of fast food restaurants among American over a period of ten years.
It is pervasive from information supplied that the lowest number of eating fast food in restaurant belonged to everyday eaters, while in 2013, the vast majority of citizen ate fast food once or twice a month.
As figure shown, by passing time the number of every day eaters decreased, and this rate remained unchanged in 2006 and 2013; this trend was the same for citizens who never consume fast food at restaurant.
From marginally above 15% in 2003, the number of several time consumers peaked at 20% in 2006, before falling to around 15% in 2013. Similarly, once a week group saw a small rise in 2006 that was well below 35%, and then decreased to significantly over 25% in 2013. In stark contrast, the category of once or twice month from 30% in 2006, the number of people who ate fast food in restaurant dropped sharply to exactly 25% and the following 7 years saw a rapid increase.
- the plans below show the layout of a university sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- the plans below show the layout of a university sports center now and how it will be look after redevelopment 73
- the chart below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 89
- the chart below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly over 25% in 2013. In stark contrast, the category of once or twice month fro...
^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, the category of once or twice month from 30% in 2006, the number of people w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66304347826 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51880920495 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0364889159 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253365957385 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122753865083 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669101928268 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155326530024 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517238241945 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.