The bar chart provides information about the frequency with which USA's people consumed food in fast foods restaurants over a period of 10 years, from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the majority of people ate in fast food only few times a month: for example, in 2003 the people who consumed in fast foods once a week represent about the 30% of population, as well as people who frequented restaurants once or twice a month.
In 2006, instead, more consumers went to fast foods once a week, as it can be seen from the percentage that rose until almost 35%, on the contrary, the number of people who ate junk food once or twice a month decreased reaching the 25%.
The 2013 is clearly in contrast to 2006 since the percentage of people who went to fast food chains once or twice a week during this year, went up almost to 35%, overcoming those who ate there once a week of about 10%. In the same year, the number of several times a week's costumers is nearly equal to the number of those who went few times a year.
In conclusion, from 2003 to 2013 the number of people who never ate in fast food restaurants didn't overcome 5% as well as those who consumed everyday the same junk food.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... who never ate in fast food restaurants didnt overcome 5% as well as those who consum...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ercome 5% as well as those who consumed everyday the same junk food.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4200913242 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31298258771 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461187214612 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3720980457 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.333333333 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5 22.9334400587 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328125868996 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19959247233 0.103423049105 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121104057603 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231289962522 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10047586844 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.95 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.