The presented chart indicates the percentages of American people who ate at restaurants in 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, while eating fast food at restaurant were not common every day and never do in three years, once a week and once or twice a month were more prevalent.
As can be seen from the chart, in 2003 the consumption of everyday fast food between the US citizen was below five percent, and who ate several times a week reached more than 15 percent, while this percent was at its highest level with whom tried once a week more than 30%, this number was slightly lower in once or twice a month category. Nearly 16% of American went restaurant a few times a year in 2003, and the percentage of people who never went was 5%.
In 2006 and 2013, the every day, and the two other opposite categories including: a few times a year and never used customers were equal about 2.5%, 15% and 4 % respectively. While about 20% showed tendency to eat several times a week in 2006, this number was 16% in 2013.
In 2013 the frequency of going to restaurant once or twice a month (about 33%)was at the same with 2006 when people went to restaurant once a week. The opposite also true these years, in 2013 more people went to restaurant once a week (nearly 27%), while only about 25% tried once or twice a month eating fast food at restaurants.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'the everyday'?
Suggestion: the everyday
...o never went was 5%. In 2006 and 2013, the every day, and the two other opposite categories ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44715447154 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34191542346 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475609756098 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3844126893 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236217036416 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126313043408 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746805577214 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155850893319 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821513862881 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.