The bar graph compares and contrasts data on the change in the percentage of people of the USA visiting eating joints for a bite of fast food in 2003,2006 and 2013.
In an overview, the population had meals outside in a moderate frequency of once a week, or once or twice a month. In contrast, the humankind going daily or never to a restaurant remained low.
In 2003 and 2006, nearly 31% and 33% of American natives preferred to go once a week. This number is fairly low, about 16% and 20% for the people who go several times a week.
After seven years, in 2013 the percentage of foodies going once a week decreased and once or twice a month increased to 33%, but the humans going few times a year remained constant at 15% for 2006 and 2013.
Moreover, individuals going every day saw a decrease of 1% in 2006 in comparison to 2003 and remained constant at 3% in 2013. However, the same trend is depicted for persons who never went to a restaurant with the lowest value of 4% in 2013.
- The diagram below shows information about the amount of money spent on alcohol and drugs Summarize the info by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 61
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problems 73
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countriesbetween 1990 and 1999
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... never to a restaurant remained low. In 2003 and 2006, nearly 31% and 33% of Am...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39459459459 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4510757019 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0662574384 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157431867599 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735171012717 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671122481965 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981839166417 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759991121575 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.