The given diagram shows the proportion of American who ate fast food with different frequency in 2003, 2006 and 2013. A glance at the graph reveals that a majority of American ate fast food regularlly in these three years.
As we can see, only a small minority of American chose fast food every day or never took it try in these three years, which both of two frequency were under 5 percent.
Compared to the two unusual crimastance, most American usually engaged in fast food restaurants about once a week or once or twice a month. The percent of the two frequency corresponded roughly ranging from 25% to 35% in these three years. It could be seen that in 2006, American were more usual to have fast food meals than other two years.
However, there was a downward trends of the frequency of eating fast food in America. The graph shows that the percentage of eating it once or twice a month increased nearly 10% from 2006 to 2013.
In conclusion, although most American decreased their needs to fast food along with time, there was relatively a large population of taking unhealthy diets in America. Therefore, it is necessary to improve Americans' realization to their own health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...only a small minority of American chose fast food every day or never took it try in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tries'?
Suggestion: tries
...se fast food every day or never took it try in these three years, which both of two...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7729468599 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51740423682 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4531831896 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204528495023 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090458951245 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740456617383 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12168491328 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078720044497 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.