The two provided tables illustrates the number of international students stemming from distinctive nations study in Canada and the USA in two school years.
In general, the Chinese students had a tendency to enrol in school in Canada while the USA was an ideal place for Canadian pupils to otp for when it comes to studying abroad. It’s also noticeable that despite witnessing a slight decrease in the number of students, America still retained its prevelance with numerous pupils.
As regard to Canada, it’s important that the biggest change in the number of students moving in this country was experienced in China(45%) from 5400 to 7850 in merely 2 years. The upward trend also can be seen in the figure for India and the USA as the figure for India pluged by 35% ( from 2100 to 2835), which was nearly 4 times as much as that of America (9%) with 450 pupils going to Canada for their studies. Overall, almost one third students from all three nations were drawn into canada between 2002 and 2004, which triggered a rise from 59870 to 70004 in the total students.
Turning to the USA. There was an upward trend in the figure for China and Canada while the opposite was true for India. Starting from 7%, Canada witnessed the biggest shift from 31000 to 33170, followed by 6%(110000-116600) for china and -9%(200000-182000) for india. There was also a decline in the total number of international students in the USA, which was the result of dramatic decrease in the number of Indian pupils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udying abroad. It’s also noticeable that despite witnessing a slight decrease in ...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...SA as the figure for India pluged by 35% from 2100 to 2835, which was nearly 4 ti...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...00 to 33170, followed by 6%110000-116600 for china and -9%200000-182000 for indi...
^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0-116600 for china and -9%200000-182000 for india. There was also a decline in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51446523981 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517374517375 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1508231357 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238898002122 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987409460175 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057395881052 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151414877218 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542256804132 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.