The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the differences in the sales of automobile production in several regions worldwide, measured in proportion, over a 5-year period, starting from 2006.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that Asian car production gradually increased in sales, while the opposite trend is true for that of South America. Additionally, Europe and North America witnessed little variation in the total sales of car manufacture.
More specifically, despite starting roughly one-third of the automobile production’s sales, the Asian figures experienced a gradual growth over the observed period, rising to half of the total sales among the other areas in 2010. However, the figure for South American nations witnessed a slight downward trend, with a rate of approximately 30% in 2006, gradually decreasing to only a tenth in five consecutive years.
Looking at the chart in more detail, North America’s sales only accounted for only over 10%, which was the lowest figure among other regions in 2006. In addition, its figure declined and reached the bottom of roughly 5% in 2009, before rising back to its initial figure. On the contrary, European nations experienced a slight rise of 10% in 2008 compared to its figure in 2006, followed by marginally falling to about 30% in 2010.
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area 73
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 11
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25352112676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8371183745 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568075117371 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1567490754 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.875 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213802818699 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919014947755 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666117409609 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13247771852 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492778428224 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.