The chart shows the percentage of Irish language speaker in five provinces in five years.
Given is the line graph illustrating changes in the proportion of people who can speak Irish in five regions from 1981 to 2002. In general, all provinces witnessed an upward trend during this period. Besides, while Munster and Connacht were places with the biggest number of speakers, Leinster had the smallest one.
With regards to Munster and Connacht, these areas respectively had about 35% and 40% of Irish speakers in 1981. While there were minute rises from 1981 to 1991 (1-2%), a considerable growth of approximately 10% was recorded after five years. Nevertheless, little changes could be seen from 1996 to 2002.
As mentioned above, Leinster was the province with the fewest inhabitants using Irish, continuously 10% lower that the highest figures. Even though the region had a fall in 1986, the quantity went up in 1986 and similar to other provinces, it surged to more than 35% in the next 10 years and remained constant after that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-30 | ryannguyen0303 | 76 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people say that the teaching method with a teacher and students in a classroom will not exist by the year 2050.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, nevertheless, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57494615491 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70253164557 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1213233423 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149386746888 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585523290523 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511770325944 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969353307228 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369017840581 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.