the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph illustrates the quantity of people from 65 years old in three countries - japan, sweden and usa over a 100-year period, from 1940 to 2040. In general, the percentage of this population group in all nations has an upward trend during the mentioned time.
With regard to japan, in 1940, the elderly accounted for 5% and slighly decreased after 10 years to about 4% before levelling off at this point for more than 2 decades. In the late 20th century, the figure tended to increase gradually, back to the level of 1940 in 2005. Especially, the number is predicted to have a surge in the next 40 years, reaching more than 25% of the population.
Even though sweden and usa have the same trend as japan, their patterns are more alike. At the begining of the period, the proportions of 65-and-over people were 6% and 10% for sweden and The United States alternatively. These figures rose dramatically and both doubled in 1980 before a decline. While the downward trend of sweden stopped before 2000, this of America is projected to continue until 2020.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of Irish language speaker in five provinces in five years 58
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fall out nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy source Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people say that the teaching method with a teacher and students in a classroom will not exist by the year 2050.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?Give reasons for your an 84
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in general, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77837837838 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54965714008 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637837837838 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3383437836 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13478321711 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472612340268 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638083171751 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093306969055 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658271961798 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.