The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart provides the data about educational system for two genders such as male and female teachers in the UK for 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that, in the figure experienced different type of fluctuations such as for nursery worked more women, but afterwards by university system was less rates. Another interesting point is that, men in educational system were opposite to women.
Looking at the details, in pre-school was educated higher rates the amount of 98 by women teachers while in this system witnessed less degree in men teachers.
Subsequently, women rates dropped significantly in other type of educational settings, it was around 96 for primary school. By other kind of educational system men teaching increased dramatically in Secondary school.
In college system men and women teachers educated in equal degree. By university system, two types of gender teachers educating percentages changed to opposite it was approximately for men and women teachers 50 and 30 percentages respectively just over the time, 2010.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- Learning to manage money is one of the key aspects ofadult life How in your view can individuals best learn to manage their money 61
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these viewas and give your own opinion 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK Italy Sweden and Portugal between 1967and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun rates is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...but afterwards by university system was less rates. Another interesting point is tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is that, men in educational system were opposite to women. Looking at the det...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, while, as for, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36144578313 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95583693466 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2194456659 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164887916342 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831730063132 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586334048849 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104380655959 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624168680551 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.