The bar chart illustrates the proportion of males and females who passes the driving exam in a certain country in Asia in four particular years including 1908, 1990, 2000, and 2010.
The initial impression of the picture is the noticeable disparity between women and men result which conveyed that women's driving test performances were superior to men. It is also apparent that the percentage of people passing the exam was rose over the period surveyed, in general.
From 1980 to 1990, the figure for females with passing results was roughly 50%, about an average of 15% higher than that of men, clearly. However, after 10 years, the data of men expressed a significantly higher percentage increased, compared to women with around 5%.
Starting from the beginning of the 21st century, people who identified as female passing the driving test reached its peak at nearly 70% as well as soaked the gap with the figure for men of 20% higher. By contrast with the moderate increase in previous years, 2010 witnessed a slight drop of 3% estimated in "woman" data, whereas the percentage of men passing results in the exam was seemed to be unchanged.
- The plans below show a science park in 2008 and the same science park today 2021 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below 89
- The pie charts compare the percentage of carbohydrates protein and fat with three different diet programs 73
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below 89
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people travelling there is an growing demand for more flightsWhat problems does this have on the environment What measures could be taken to solve the problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s including 1908, 1990, 2000, and 2010. The initial impression of the picture is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s years, 2010 witnessed a slight drop of 3% estimated in 'woman' data, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, whereas, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69522079118 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7399907495 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213814338613 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985609587144 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381146577953 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132962671283 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271426219418 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.