There are several arguments about many museums and art exhibits charge tickets for allowing visitors to enter, meanwhile others are free. In my opinion, it is far better to charge an entry fee after comparing between two circumstances.
It is an undeniable truth that charging admission fees actually allow the galleries to use the revenued money for needed things that could improve guests' service namely as upgrading facilities, re-built the place,... If they do not charge the fees, these institutions will not have any source of revenue other than the funds received from the government’s budget or charitable organizations which is not stable, obviously, and bring a non-insurance impact for the museum in a long run. Moreover, the business could additionally hire staff with a higher salary not only for a stable human source but also for high-quality ability from them. So that the customers would have a satisfying experience while visiting the place.
On the other hand, when museums don't charge admission, low-income people would have opportunities to visit art institutions expand their knowledge about history and art. Undoubtfully, a mutual benefit could be achieved through implementing this policy. Not only that, but it would also expand the quality of their spiritual life after enjoying and feeling the message expressed from the arts. But while people have a deeper look at the nature of the problem, it is apparent that the growth in the number of visitors after applying this policy would lead to some following effect, the biggest one is the rapid degradation of infrastructure and facilities. This would likely cause chaos and petty crimes such as pickpocketing as well as covering the art galleries of solemn images.
To sum up, eventhough charging admission fees has both advantages and disadvantages side, I am of the opinion that the drawbacks of it outweigh the remained ones.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and the chart below compare the average amounts of money spent by students while studying in four different countries in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- MANY MUSEUMS CHARGE FOR ADMISSION WHILE OTHERS ARE FREE DO YOU THINK THE ADVANTAGES OF CHARGING FEES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES 84
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...upgrading facilities, re-built the place,... If they do not charge the fees, these...
^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lso for high-quality ability from them. So that the customers would have a satisfying e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce. On the other hand, when museums dont charge admission, low-income people wou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24104234528 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87156044208 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635179153094 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4901277528 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308011097949 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096845149753 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918507918099 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200443109527 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085931918206 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.