The chart shows the results of a survey conducted in the UK in three different years regarding the level of interest in 6 particular sports.
The chart compares a survey carried out in the UK in three distinct years in terms of 6 types of sports that local residents indulged in.
It is clear from the chart that most of UK’s inhabitants were more interested in football compared to others. Additionally, an upward trend was recorded in all categories except the figure for tennis.
In 1995, the proportion of individuals fond of football constituted about 40% of the total, compared to approximately 35% of people keen on rugby. Meanwhile, there were over 30% and nearly 30% of citizens loving tennis and swimming in turn. Likewise, the rate of volleyball stood at around 28%, which outnumbered that of golf by two to one, at 17%. To 2000, all the figures in the chart underwent steady growths, while that of tennis shared an opposite trend.
In 2005, the share of football dropped slowly to nearly 40% and remained the most popular type of sport among inhabitants. At the same time, this nation witnessed an insignificant rise to over 35% in the share of rugby whereas the percentages of swimming and volleyball were matched with a roughly similar trend to the point, at which they shared a comparable figure, at exactly 35%. Conversely, a gradual decline to 30% was recorded in the proportion of tennis, followed by a steady increase to about 20% in that of golf.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 64 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 75 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans 78
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between years 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 79
- the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time 73
- Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81659388646 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71746974002 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4460977909 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104440960513 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461992179803 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795045045773 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944078577578 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964684248114 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.