The pie charts compare the typical reasons for using mobile phones answered by one African country's teenagers in the year 2016 to 2019.
Looking at the graph, it readily appears that social networking was the greatest motivation with a percentage of around 50% throughout the period, while phone calls ranked last and lessened at the end. Meanwhile, emailing and photographing kept pretty steady figures.
The data on phone calls fluctuated slightly from 2016 to 2018 with proportions of 10%, 13% and 11% respectively, before experiencing a sharply downward trend in 2019 at 5%. On the contrary, social networks decreased by 2% in 2017 before noticeably rising to 51% in 2018 and 56% by the end of the survey period.
Both email and digital camera followed a clear trend throughout 4 years. After remaining at 15% in the first 2 years, taking photos by mobile phones started becoming a more common reason to use phones illustrated by its increase to 18% and 20% in 2018 and 2019 consecutively. Whereas, emailing via phone gradually dropped from 25% at the beginning of the survey to 24% in 2017, making up 20% in 2018 and 19% by the end.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88205128205 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70300682405 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.57323723 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170072898732 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756224892361 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101739825841 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127091439669 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120917900765 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.