The pie charts illustrate the survey outcomes showing main reasons for teenagers in an African country using their phones from 2016 to 2019.
Overall, it is apparent that the major reason for African adolescents to use phones was generally social networking purposes whereas phone calls contributed to the smallest proportion in all the given years.
In 2016, the use of electronic devises for social networks comprised the half the respondents. Although this figure decreased by 2% in the following year, it immediately recovered, reaching 56% in 2019. Despite having a downward trend, the emails were the second in terms of the popularity among the teenagers. The percentage stood at quarter in the first year, which was then followed by steady fall, hitting the lowest point of 19% in the final year.
15% of respondents reported that they used phones for taking photos in 2016 and 2017, but this number witnessed a 2% growth every year. Ultimately, there was a 3% increase in the quantity of teenagers who used the phone for making phone calls from 10% to 13% from 2016 to 2017. However, this figure declined, and reached merely 5% in 2019.
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph below shows the reason for the use of social media by businesses by size of business in 2012 77
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01041666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.565272044 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3824162416 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294235477455 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116443977473 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136955063147 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208488220562 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158387898488 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.