The given vertical bar graph reveals the information about the percentage of eight different sports, and one other, played in Australia, by boys and girls in 2003.
Overall, boys were experienced downward trend in netball, while girls showed upward trend in alike sport. Both groups had some fluctuations in all activities. Initially girls had been lower rate in other sports, girls outraced boys in swimming.
It can be seen that, swimming was most liked by girls at 21%, being higher than boys group rate by approximately 13%. Girls data was highly on increased line in netball, almost 25%. However, the figure showed that, group of boys was not interested in netball and it touched the lowest level. Whereas, the participating in tennis had been similar in both groups; around 6%, and 7% respectively.
Secondly, in Australia the football game was most played by a group of boys 24% and 5% by girls. Moreover, boys were more affected by martial arts. Probing ahead, the girls were more popular in athletics as compared to boys. Neither girls nor boys crossed the level of 9% in basketball.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and ma 78
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quadrent of the year. 67
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advan 84
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s group rate by approximately 13%. Girls data was highly on increased line in net...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58437485357 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0683610053 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123094504058 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431224693314 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05307689366 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794778669328 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359300001131 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.