The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the presence at amusement venues and also given a list of admission costs of those venues in 2009. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, most people was love to go cinemas venue in 2009 over the 1000 because of the cost of admission was low price as opposed to the sport's entry cost. Least amount of people went to sport vanue aroud 200 on same year for behind of admmision cost was comperatively higher then cinemas.
In terms of cinema, the entry cost was low about ( $15 for one and $55 for a family which includes 4 people respectively). on the other hand, sports venue like AFL- a football game was costly for entrance which two packages about $75 and $298. Among sports, the cricket game was low in price compare to AFL. That's why people like to enjoy cinemas in 2009.
Moreover, Theme parks were very interesting venues. it was quite a high price for $70 and $210 liken to cinema packages. Around 200 people were going to theme parks to enjoy their holidays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-10 | HappyCandy | view | |
| 2022-01-10 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | anna103 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | anna103 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...mission was low price as opposed to the sports entry cost. Least amount of people went...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...ce as opposed to the sports entry cost. Least amount of people went to sport vanue ar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'higher than'?
Suggestion: higher than
...ind of admmision cost was comperatively higher then cinemas. In terms of cinema, the ent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...admmision cost was comperatively higher then cinemas. In terms of cinema, the ent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of cinema, the entry cost was low about 5 for one and 5 for a family which inclu...
^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...y which includes 4 people respectively. on the other hand, sports venue like AFL- ...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...t game was low in price compare to AFL. Thats why people like to enjoy cinemas in 200...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 53, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eme parks were very interesting venues. it was quite a high price for 0 and 10 li...
^^
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... it was quite a high price for 0 and 10 liken to cinema packages. Around 200 peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54494382022 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31057382922 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.396060549 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5454545455 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130339579393 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532302237678 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776101113495 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100943297625 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865355352537 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.