The given bar and pie charts illustrate Glasgow's which is a city in Scotland people's education levels by age range and gender in 2010. Brief glance gives information that the most elderly people are non-educated, by contrast, the majority of young adults are high educated, besides, women's and men's education level was nearly similar with each other in 2010.
About the levels of education with age range shows that in age between 16-24, 24-35, and 35-50 people had educated a lot than other categories. Those age ranges people's one-tenth of each hadn't got any qualifications.Among 16-24 and 35-50 people's 20 per cent each, 24-35 aged people's 15 percent of them had school certification. Furthermore, more than 70 per cent of all of them were highly educated which means got university degrees. In the people who aged 50-75's half of them had got university degrees but school certificated and non-qualified people were 20% and 30% respectively. Finally, 75 and plus people's more than 70% of them had not got educational degree, but nearly one third were highly educated and only 3% people had graduated their high schools.
Education levels by genders that females were almost same as males in 3 different categories. Not educated people were occupied the biggest slice in the chart that women's 38 per cent, men's 35 per cent. Whereas, their one third (33%) both of genders people were finished their high schools. Rest of the people were graduated their universities and had their degrees which were slightly difference between females and males that 29% and 34% for each in 2010, in Glasgow that city of Scotland.
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 84
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion? 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 64
- the pie charts below give information about household expenditure of an average US family in different years. 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...se age ranges peoples one-tenth of each hadnt got any qualifications.Among 16-24 and ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Among
...th of each hadnt got any qualifications.Among 16-24 and 35-50 peoples 20 per cent eac...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t womens 38 per cent, mens 35 per cent. Whereas, their one third 33% both of genders pe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03345724907 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68201121806 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6772535691 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203621458074 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971470677268 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101066169175 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187860068015 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123712072434 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.