The diagrams show statistic information regarding the ages of the habitants of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also a estimative for 2050.
We can see that in 2000 the majority of people in Yemen was between 0 and 14 years old, whith 50.1%, whereas in Italy most of the population was between 15- 59 years old (61.6%), in the same year. On the other hand, just 3.6% of people in the former country was 60 years old or more in 2000, while in the latter country this figure is represented with 24.1%.
The projections for 2050 show that the number of people with 15-59 years and 60 years or more will increase in Yemen, reaching 57.3% and 5.7% respectively. In contrast, in Italy, the population with 15-59 years will decrease to 46.2%, while people with 60 years or more will grow to 42.3%
Overall, it is possible to see that there is an upward trend on the rates of people with 60 years or more in both countries.
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 69
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots What is your opinion 57
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nts of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also a estimative for 2050. We can see tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43195266272 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31407099015 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0336235166 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4 5.23603664747 256% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125703796264 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984860086622 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986291040783 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103285813664 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108473132212 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.82 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.4 10.3012195122 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.