The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chart illustrates how many million people visited UK and how many UK residents travelled abroad during 1979 to 1999, with the bar chart depicting what countries were more interested in by UK dwellers to visit in 1999.
As can be clearly observed from the first chart, there were a significant increase in both travelling to and from UK. Around 10 million individuals made a visit to UK from foreign countries in 1979. While it experienced a slight rise till 1986, the number of visitors went up dramatically to near 30 million in 1999. On the other hand, approximately 12 million of UK residents visited abroad in 1979. Whereas there was a gradual climb to around 20 million by 1984, from 1985 onward, it skyrocketed to more than 50 million in 1999.
Turning to the second chart, five distinctive countries were considered as the popular destinations by UK dwellers in 1999. More than 10 million people who were resident in UK had an experience of visiting France, although it was a bit more than Spain visitors (about 20 million). Followed by USA with less than 5 million, then Greece and Turkey, by about 4 and 3 million, respectively.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that unlike the fact that the number of input and output tourists of UK rose significantly during 2 decades of 1979 till 1999, UK residents who travelled abroad always outstripped travelers who visited UK. Meanwhile, nearer countries of France and Spain were among the most popular regions than other European nations or America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-23 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 75
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, well, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88030888031 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73905502765 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9850083297 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259607515227 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114629447851 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673224879619 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186271656597 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292563724487 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.