The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marial status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Given are the bar graphs illustrating the number of marriages and divorces in the USA from 1970 to 2000, and the percentage of marital status of Adults in 1970 and 2000.
It is clear that divorce rate between 1970 and 2000 was dwarfed by matrimony. Meanwhile, the proportion for married status was the category receiving the highest expenditure, in comparison with other statuses.
The figure for marriages in two of the first years was highest, at 2.5 millions; after falling from the highest point, the figure saw a slight lull until 2000, at 2 millions. At the same time, standing at 1 million in 1970, the divorce rate fluctuated over the next two years and the fourth remained the same as in the previous year.
For the marital status, people tended to get married in two of years, especially in 1970, at 70%. In stark contrast, people who never married were negatively correlated, under 20%. Moreover, a mere minority of widowed and divorced statuses, both figure belowed 10%.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 81
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 60
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 59
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 81
- The graph below shows the change in the proportion of GDP in three areas in a particular country between 2000 and 2020. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar graphs illustrating the number ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56270566345 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.700775186 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213746834828 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977929212965 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722509734474 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140660445704 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576152705919 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.