The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the pie charts compares populations in ages of two specific countries: Italy and Yemen in 2000 and 2050. Overall, 15-50-year-old citizens always account for a significant proportion.
Regarding each country, in 2000, people above 60 years old in Yemen made up roughly 50& whereas 0-14-year-old people held a minor percentage of 3.6% and the rest was 15-59 years group. However, in 2050, group 15-59 years will be the largest population in the country, followed by group 60+ years, 57.3%, and 37.0% respectively. The proportion of group 0-14 years will increase by 2& in the next 50 years.
About two-thirds of Italy's population was group 15-59 years in 2000. This figure for group 0-14 years was 24.1%, which was 10% higher than people above 60 years old. Nevertheless, there will be a dramatic alteration in Italy population in 2050 as the percentage of group 60+ years will double its statistics in 2000, while this figure for citizens in 15-59 years group will decline by 20%.
Comparing Yemen and Italy, it is witnessed that the significant change in Yemen's population lied in people between 15-59 years old while this figure for Italy is group 60+ years.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph below shows the number of passengers railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people now have the freedom to work and live anywhere because of advances in communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 84
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99492385787 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66785920752 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.623282647 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122947914698 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765329155897 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689284836904 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112096538409 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559342187746 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.