The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following charts demonstrate about the percentages in three various age groups of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also the anticipation for the populations of two countries in 2050.
Overall, In Yemen, most people whose age groups range from 0 to 14, while in Italy people from 15 to 59 are majoring in 2000. Meanwhile, in 2050 predictions, the most quantity will be ages groups from 15 to 59 in two countries.
Turning to the Yemen’s populations in 2000, the age group from 0 to 14 was the highest percentage with 50,1% , followed distantly was the age group from 15 to 59 with 46,3%, compared with the old group which only accounted for 3,6%. In contrast, the popular age group in Italy in the same time was 15 to 59 group with 61,6%, while the 60 above group was followed distantly with 24,1% and the children group only was 14.3%
In 2050 projections, the most custom Yemen populations will be 15 to 39 groups with 57.3% while the 0 to 14 populations in 2050 will decrease to 37%, the old populations will be 5,7%. The 15 to 59 group in Italy will be the most popular group at 46,2%. Followed distantly by 42.3% for 60 above group.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-25 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-09-22 nijam 67 view
2023-08-09 ycgtang 67 view
2023-01-04 nle2006 73 view
2022-08-05 lucluc 78 view
Essays by user unknownabc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...14 was the highest percentage with 50,1% , followed distantly was the age group fr...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...distantly by 42.3% for 60 above group.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54833092871 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427884615385 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.026138632 43.030603864 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140136108897 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092091469344 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628101280154 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125256057772 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632624308951 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.