The pie charts provide information about the changes of the percentage of population from three various age groups in two different countries in 2000. It also predicts the trend upto 2050.
Overview, the proportion of population from these given countries had shown some significant changes and it also estimated increasing and declining trend. In 2000, age between 0 to 14 years, the percentage of population was exactly a half and it is likely to decrease 37.0% by 2050. However, from 15 to 59 age category, the figure was 46.3% in 2000 and it will reach 57.3% in 2050. Similarly, the figure was only 3.6% in 2000 and there is a exactly 2.1% growth by 2050 among elder group.
Moving to Italy, the proportion of population from 60 plus year was nearly a quarter in 2000. However, the trend is likely to improve by 42.3 percent. In contrast, the percentage of population is expected to drop down 11.5% in 2050 but it was 14.3% in 2000 , between 0 and 14 years age group. At the same time, population rate from adult was the highest at 61.6% and it is estimated around 15.4% fall by the year 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edicts the trend upto 2050. Overview, the proportion of population from these...
^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... upto 2050. Overview, the proportion of population from these given countries...
^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kely to decrease 37.0% by 2050. However, from 15 to 59 age category, the figure ...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...0% by 2050. However, from 15 to 59 age category, the figure was 46.3% in 2000 and it w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0. However, from 15 to 59 age category, the figure was 46.3% in 2000 and it will...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it will reach 57.3% in 2050. Similarly, the figure was only 3.6% in 2000 and the...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gure was only 3.6% in 2000 and there is a exactly 2.1% growth by 2050 among elder...
^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among elder group. Moving to Italy, the proportion of population from 60 pl...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up. Moving to Italy, the proportion of population from 60 plus year was near...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... population from 60 plus year was nearly a quarter in 2000. However, the trend i...
^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was nearly a quarter in 2000. However, the trend is likely to improve by 42.3 p...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to improve by 42.3 percent. In contrast, the percentage of population is expected...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 11.5% in 2050 but it was 14.3% in 2000 , between 0 and 14 years age group. At t...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pulation rate from adult was the highest at 61.6% and it is estimated around 15.4...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62755102041 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54548156743 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0595466783 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169011739582 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738890013676 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477379533473 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134999557411 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327435680651 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.