The charts below show the average annual spending for Canadian households in the year 1972 and the year 2002.
The given pie charts compare the amount of money Canadian people used for various households in 1972 and 2002.
In general, the sending on Food, Petro, Furniture, and Books witnessed downward trends while the amount consumed for other items decreased over the period. In addition, Canadians used the largest amount for Food in 1972, but the priority changed after the 30-year period for Cars.
In 1972, a majority of the spending was for Food (39%) and was 17% more than the amount for Cars. Following that were the figures for Furniture and Petro, making up 11% and 10% respectively. Canadians spent a small minority (under 10%) of their expenditure on the others namely: Restaurants, Computers, and Books.
Thirty years later, there was a dramatic increase of 18% in the payment for Cars. With an enormous reduction and increase correspondingly, both Food and Restaurants received the same amount of spending and were the second biggest part, with 14% for each. Likewise, people living in Canada used a similar volume for Petrol and Furniture (9%). Whereas the percentage of Computers climbed slightly by 8% from 3% in 1972, that of Books fell to only 3% from 7% in 1972.
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2005 78
- The maps below show the organization of a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 73
- Some people believe that parents have a great influence on children s growth but influences from the outside play a more important role Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d after the 30-year period for Cars. In 1972, a majority of the spending was fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, second, whereas, while, as for, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97461928934 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57825049379 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604060913706 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4121452904 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274351944614 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106497936793 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811763282142 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17810944672 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509236893995 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.