The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts illustrate the proportion of three categories of nutrients namely sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar contained in 4 meals on the daily basis. If consumed in large amount, those are not beneficial for health.

Sodium consumed holds the largest share in dinner, at 43%, which is 6% higher the second rank – saturated fat. The rate of eating added sugar in dinner is over a fifth in the field.

The consumption of sodium and saturated fat in lunch shares a similar pattern, with 29% and 26% respectively. The amount of added sugar in lunch is slightly smaller, at 19%.

In breakfast, the percentage of these types of nutrients is relatively the same, less than a fifth.

In snack, added sugar consumption holds the lion’s share (42%) and this is twice as much as that of saturated fat. The rate of sodium accounts for 14%, which is the lowest in total shares.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 Berbie 11 view
Essays by user ChristineNguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pattern, with 29% and 26% respectively. The amount of added sugar in lunch is sligh...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81290322581 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58220920346 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3869353327 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8888888889 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600925485253 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247866924209 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267122402063 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374269888399 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245992352394 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.