The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The given graphical representation offer a fleet glimpse of three distinctive forms of aliments consumed by the population of America which can be negatively impact upon health. Statistical figures show that the American individuals prone to admix sodium along with saturated fat for their dinner meals whereas in terms of snacks they principally ingest them by blending sugars.
It is explicit that myriad number of American people prefer partaking their dinner meals with sodium together with saturated fat on account of their nourishing effects, making up 43% versus 37%. Moreover, over and roughly one quarter of their lunch food contains sodium and saturated fat. By comparison, a smaller share of their breakfast and snacks comprises 21%, 16% and 14% accordingly.
Regarding to adding sugar, American population mostly consume snacks by mixing sugars, accounting for 42%. In the interim, 23 % of their dinner meal is responsible for sugar. On the contrary, the index of breakfast and lunch constitutes 19% versus 16%.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-08 nobitaa 78 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 11 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-04 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-06 Tosyne 67 view
Essays by user selenophile :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43125 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75333985684 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68125 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9208945326 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0609599306372 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254689675468 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030257228875 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448112040169 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380461228811 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.