The pie chart compares the average proportion of different types of nutrients, including sugar, saturated fat and added sugar, which are absorbed through four meals in America.
Overview, breakfast meal indicates the lowest consumption of three types of nutrients, with the smallest average percentage. Also, people in America have a tendency to consume three types of nutrients in dinner and snacks more than that in lunch and breakfast.
As can be seen from the chart, sodium and saturated fat have the same variation of average percentage in typical meals in the USA. Dinner meal shows the largest consumption in types of nutrients with 43% for sodium and 37% for saturated fat. While the consumption of sodium in breakfast is equal to snacks meal (14%), breakfast meal (21%) illustrates a higher proportion of saturated fat eaten in comparison with that in dinner meal (16%).
According to the chart, the average percentage in four meals indicates the change in consuming added sugar. The highest percentage of added sugar eaten belongs to snacks with 42% in total. The average percentage of this type of nutrients shows a smaller consumption in dinner compared to snacks, which is opposite to the corresponding proportion of sodium and saturated fats.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: alpgiray
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'snack'.
Suggestion: snack
...tion of sodium in breakfast is equal to snacks meal 14%, breakfast meal 21% illustrate...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18719211823 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74854776027 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467980295567 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4142829121 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30754185235 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144106206103 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438538156532 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19613624972 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430331585857 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.