The pie charts compare the average intake of three nutrients in four main meals, the overconsumption of which can be detrimental to health.
It is clear that sodium and saturated fat are rich in foods eaten in dinner while added sugar is mostly taken infrom snack. In addition, breakfast is least nutrient-dense, which is revealed by the smallest pie on all charts.
Regarding sodium and saturated fat, both nutrients are mostly provided in evening meals, at 43% and 37% respectively, while the percentages of them in lunch consistently ranks second, with 29% and 26%. A contrast is an equal proportion of sodium is contained in snacks and breakfast, accounting for 14% each, whereas the former meal is richer in saturated fat than the latter one, with 21% and 16% respectively.
In terms of added sugar, more than 40% of this nutrient is from snacks, which nearly doubles the figure for dinner, at 23%. The added sugar value in lunch is significantly lower, with 19%, while like other nutrients, breakfast is not dense in added sugar, contributing only 16%.
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 50
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66871165644 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.8768928884 2.65546596893 146% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668711656442 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2137002298 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0936928632843 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482647700976 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508685885612 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703428722467 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058016953018 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.