The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevants
These charts show the changes in households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week between 1920 and 2019.
overall, the first chart suggests that the overall trend for the period is an increase. The washing machine had the lowest total increase and had a fall in numbers from 1960 to 1980. The refrigerator was the main electrical appliance used most, with vacuum cleaner seeing a stable rise. The second chart indicates that there is a decrease in the period in the number of hours that people did housework per week.
In the first chart, all machines rose from 1920 to 2019. The main appliance used in most households is a refrigerator. In 1920, no family consumed it, then the number had a rise to 100 percent in 1980. This number did not change after 1980. With it, vacuum cleaner also had a consistent increase to 100 percentage in 2000, when in 1920, just 30 percent of families used it. people consumed washing machine increased slowly to 70 percent in 1960, then decreased over 60 percent, then it increased slowly again, so it actually increased by more than 30 percent from 1920 to 2019.
According to the second chart, the number of hours of housework per week per household had a steady fall from 1920 to 1960, then it decreased slower. it dropped by 40 hours total.
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant write at least 150 words 70
- In Many Countries Today People In Cities Either Live Alone Or In Small Family Units Rather Than In Large Extended Family Groups Is This A Positive Or Negative Trend 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...work per week between 1920 and 2019. overall, the first chart suggests that the over...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...th vacuum cleaner seeing a stable rise. The second chart indicates that there is a ...
^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...1920 to 1960, then it decreased slower. it dropped by 40 hours total.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7316017316 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43085831936 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489177489177 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2394128898 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0769230769 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170853603292 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769186779305 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852077932572 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149680170709 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105184729987 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.