The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line charts demonstrate the alteration in ownership of electrical appliances and the quantity of time spent doing housework in the household throughout a century.
As an overall trend, it is clear that all of the electrical appliances became more widespread. The refrigerator generally surpassed the washing machine. On the whole, the quantity of hours of housework per week was a marginal plunge from 50% to 10% during a century.
Looking at the details, the proportions of refrigerators witnessed an exponential escalation of 90% from 1920 to 1980, followed by stability at 100% till 2019. The percentages of vacuum cleaner were surge strikingly to 90% in 1980, the figure soared negligibly to 100%. Then, there was a remain at 100% over the subsequent 20 years. The quantities of washing machine underwent soared by 30% between 1920 and 1960, followed by a slightly fall in the next 20 years. Thereafter having marginally rocket by precisely 10% in the final year. As regard, the quantity of hours per week was hit a trough of 10% in 2019.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The table graph illustrates data on department stores and 100
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castell n in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 100
- Task 1 The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... As an overall trend, it is clear that all of the electrical appliances became more wides...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...2019. The percentages of vacuum cleaner were surge strikingly to 90% in 1980, the fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'surged'.
Suggestion: surged
... The percentages of vacuum cleaner were surge strikingly to 90% in 1980, the figure s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...red negligibly to 100%. Then, there was a remain at 100% over the subsequent 20 years. T...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... 30% between 1920 and 1960, followed by a slightly fall in the next 20 years. Thereafter having...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...y a slightly fall in the next 20 years. Thereafter having marginally rocket by precisely 1...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, then, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93438447462 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0276923397 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143299842818 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528597234918 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863754503913 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136994799861 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116749242166 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.