Both graphs demonstrate the share of selected electrical household tools and the amount of weekly hours spent on housework by household for a century between 1920 to 2019. The acquisition of electrical appliances is seen to be increasing meanwhile a downward trend appears on the duration of housework per week.
The share of electrical tools owned by households shows a significant increase in refrigerator which moves from 0% to 100%. Meanwhile, the acquisition of vacuum cleaner also goes up 70% and reaches 100%. In addition, a fluctuative trend occurs on washing machine elements. On the other graph, accumulated duration of housework falls about 80% to 10 hours per week. Despite the differences, a similarity is identified between the two graphs. Starting from 1980, both experience a constant remain steady trend with a slight increase or decrease.
Therefore to conclude, the trends of both graphs end in a constant line. The graphs illustrate contradictory trends whereas the upper graph shows an upward trend and vice versa.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1 TEST 4 CAMBRIDGE 16 ACADEMIC The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...with a slight increase or decrease. Therefore to conclude, the trends of both graphs ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31515151515 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96879392578 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6360553799 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148578171254 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551410866362 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819566360176 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112033503096 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102830958465 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.