The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line graphs illustrate how the ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework changed over a period of 100 years starting from 1920.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that there was a gradual increase in the proportion of household appliances while the opposite was true to the hours spent doing housework per week.
The percentage of electrical households reached the lowest point of 0 for refrigerator, 30% for vacuum cleaner, 40% for washing machine and started to grow noticeably. The year 1980 witnessed a dramatic increase to 100% in the proportion of refrigerators and remained stable 2 years after while vacuum stayed unchanged 20 years later than freeze, at around 100%. There was a fluctuation in the percentage of washing machines until 2000 and it increased slightly to 75% in 2019.
From 1920 to 1980, there was a dramatic decline in the amount of time used doing houseworks, from 50% to 15%. The period of 20 years starting from 1960 witnessed a stability in the number of hours and it decreased slightly to 10% in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-09 | luckydough55 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Devanshu77 | view | |
| 2023-04-02 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-22 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 85
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8023037714 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7879876054 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1721829218 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853594163925 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869908243032 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128918765644 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891392415489 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.