The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the percentage of families owning electrical appliances and the number of hours they spent doing housework from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, it is clear that the ownership of three electrical appliances (washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners) increased in that period, while the time each household did housework reduced significantly.
According to the first line graph, refrigerators witnessed the most significant rise, beginning at just 0% in 1920, surging to more than 50% in 1940, and then continued to increase steadily until staying remain at 100% from 1980 to 2019. Vacuum cleaners started higher at 30% in 1920 and then rose by precisely 20% every 20 years until 1980 when growth tapered and ownership ultimately reached 100% between 2000 and 2019. In contrast, the percentage of washing machines began at 40%, climbed to 70% in 1960, then fell slightly in 1980, and recovered to finish the period at above 70%.
Regarding the second chart, in 1920, each family did housework for 50 hours per week, but then the time dropped down gradually to merely more than 10 hours per week in 2000. Finally, in 2019, the time for doing housework decreased to nearly 10 hours per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | nguyenhuyendan1133 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Luis Pham | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturers total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63960224276 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.633410603 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.285714286 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194159673144 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102953961923 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759016631813 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141489871626 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697389970268 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.