The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graphs illustrate the information about ownership of electrical appliances and number of hours spent doing housework in a city over a period of 19 years, starting from 1920.
Overall, the proportion of household machines had increased significantly, with refrigerators and vacuum cleaners owned for all family members. In the next picture, we can see the amount of time for housework declined slightly.
In the first chart, the refrigerators shooted up enormously from 1920 to 1980. After 39 years, it reached the highest point. The washing machine climbed minimally about 20% between 1920 and 2019. Although the vacuum was starting in 1920 smaller than washing machines, however, it had hit the peak of the first line after 80 years and then the vacuum moderately on the peak.
Opposite the first graph, the second graph had total decreased slightly. From 1920 to 1960, the amount of time for households plunged minimally. Since 1960, it had step by step about 15 hours per week.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the average hours worked per day by married men and women in paid employment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graphs illustrate the inf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10365853659 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66699119952 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628048780488 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.736126231 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181023211309 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686969295997 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684588791313 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109014179472 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544406311345 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.