The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two presented pie chart compares 6 distinct sources of energy in terms of the percentage they occupied in a nation’s fuel generation in 1985 and 2003.
Generally, it is evident that oil was the most popular source during this period. Also, except for hydro, substantial changes were witnessed in all other categories.
Turning into detail, in 1985, energy made from oil accounted for 52% of total supply, which was exactly 4 times higher than that of natural gas. However, after 18 years, while fuel generated from natural gas grew significantly to 23%, the figure for oil fell sharply by 13%, but still maintained its first rank among 6 groups. By contrast, energy production using other renewable sources remained the least common generation in both year, with 1% and 4%, respectively.
Regarding to the remaining sources, coal and nuclear were two categories which shared the total percentage of 40% fuel produced in both years. However, energy stemming from nuclear declined from 22% to 8%, whereas an opposite trend was detected in the proportion of coal, which gained from 8% to 22%. Meanwhile, energy generation using hydrogen was kept unchanged at 4% during the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-04 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth However some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports badminton tennis basketball rugby in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 95
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17525773196 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65735523151 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.100209278 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124740126933 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489489616832 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385570077495 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074838486024 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341950058858 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.