The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005.
In general, it can be seen that the proportion of Petro production decreased, the opposite was true for other categories. Besides, the figure for coal was the highest during the period.
To begin with, in 1995, the figure for coal is similar to gas, about 30% each. After 10 years, the percentages of energy produced for coal and gas were risen slightly to 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. By contract, the figure for Petro saw a reversed pattern in which it dropped from 29.27% in 1995 to just 19.55% in 2005.
Moving on with regard to the other energy, 2005 witnessed a gradual growth in the figure for nuclear of 3.6% from 6.4% in 1995. Also, starting at 4.9% in 1995, the proportion of other energy produced climbed minimally to 10.10% in 2005.
- The best way to deal with environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Islip town center now and its planned development 73
- The pie chart below show global Internet users favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013 80
- The table shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 and 2009. 61
- Along with the economic development, the environment of the world is being seriously polluted.What economic activities can cause harm to environment?What can be done to prevent this? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, in general, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80666666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48372480136 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6780418857 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.125 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997002148788 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552175290937 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100399044296 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991728235065 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125135362619 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.