TOPIC: The pie chart below show global Internet users’ favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013.
The pie chart gives information about favorite social media platforms of people who use the Internet in the world between 2011 and 2013.
Overall, the percentage of Internet uses on all social media channel increased from 2011 to 2013 except Facebook. However, Facebook still had the highest figure for users in the same period.
There was 59% of people who used Facebook in 2011. This figure was triple as high as Twitter. But it experienced a considerable decline of 21% to 38% in 2013. The proportion of Twitter users stood at 21% in 2011 and its percentage was twice that for Linkedln. Then this figure rose slightly to 25% in 2013. The period from 2011 to 2013 witnessed a moderate growth in Linkedln users from 10% to 15%.
Besides, Google+ and Pinterest had the similar figure for users, at 5% each in 2011. Over the next 2 years saw a significant rise in Google+ users to 14% in 2013. In contrast, the figure for Pinterest users only slightly grew by 3%.
- The picture illustrates the university application process. 56
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 57
- Some people think companies should employ old people to work as they have a lot of working experience. Others, however, think it is better to recruit young people.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The pie chart below show global Internet users favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, still, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69590643275 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43815469935 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8514431642 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.9166666667 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.25 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308872291195 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107159521924 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107844866101 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209720414841 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106564148921 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.