The pie chart below compares the number of diplomas, which were issued at the National University in 1990, 2000 and 2010 in depending on the major.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the most of the specialists that graduated were from the computer science department and the lowest amount from the law department in every year that data was obtained.
According to the chart, the popularity of computer science increased gradually from a third in 1990, to 40% in 2000, to 45% of all students in 2010. We also can see the opposite situation referring to business where this figure experienced a fall from the same 30%, to 20% in 2000, and finished at 15% in 2010.
As far as medicine and law are concerned, these sectors started and finished with the same figures, it is 25 and 15% respectively for both 1990 and 2010, with the only changes being 30% and 10% in 2000.
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the national university in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem. 84
- The chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia. 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below compares the number of diplomas, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5923566879 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4943117567 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.7626605553 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.2 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241857193466 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136901904374 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107778471568 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151172492931 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117897924263 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.