The bar chart demonstrates the increased rate of citizens of five particular cities on the planet, and their distribution to the countrysides and towns.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that from the beginning Tokyo had the highest growth rate, while Bombay in the early stage, though the rate was low, in the passage of time its growth rate was increased highly. Jakarta had the same trend as Bombay. In the case of New York, the change was not significant as the others had.
Regarding Tokyo which had the maximum number of growth over the three periods among the mentioned cities. It started approximately from 16 and end with 28. On average the accrual rate is four while the number was far more in the case of Bombay and Jakarta. In 1970 Bombay the rate was only 5 and Jakarta had less than five. In the next year, the value went over and nearly 10 respectively. After four decades the rate rose so high and remained over 25 and 15 for the former and latter city.
Turning to the other two towns, no noticeable change is observed in New York, the difference between beginning and ending point, not more than 4, while in Shanghai in 2010 the increased rate is so high comparing the previous two decades and the remained number almost 10 more than the previous.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 15 for the former and latter city. Turning to the other two towns, no noti...
^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city. Turning to the other two towns, no noticeable change is observed in New ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58515283843 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3609395551 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2967682294 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.033215688789 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133748426317 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259021434577 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305990892474 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335805805045 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 15 for the former and latter city. Turning to the other two towns, no noti...
^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city. Turning to the other two towns, no noticeable change is observed in New ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58515283843 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3609395551 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2967682294 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.033215688789 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133748426317 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259021434577 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305990892474 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335805805045 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.