The provided line charts illustrate the changes in food consumption patterns among individuals in the UK from 1942 to 2005, specifically focusing on milk (total milk and cream, skimmed milk), fresh vegetables, and fresh fruit and fruit juice.
Overall, it is evident that there were significant shifts in dietary preferences over the given period. While milk consumption experienced a general decline, the intake of fresh fruit and fruit juice witnessed a steady increase. The consumption of fresh vegetables displayed a downward trend until it was ultimately surpassed by fresh fruit in the early 21st century.
In 1942, total milk and cream consumption stood at just over 2 liters per week, which remained relatively stable until the 1970s. However, from the mid-1970s onwards, there was a gradual decrease, reaching exactly 2 liters per week by 2005. Despite this decline, total milk and cream consistently remained the most consumed type of milk throughout the entire period.
Skimmed milk, on the other hand, emerged as a popular choice in the 1970s with a consumption level slightly above 0 liters per week, and it quickly gained momentum. By the mid-1990s, skimmed milk surpassed all other types, peaking at over 1 liter per week. This indicates a growing preference for low-fat milk options among the population.
Regarding fresh vegetables, the amount consumed per week declined steadily from approximately 900 grams in 1942 to just above 700 grams around the turn of the century. In contrast, the consumption of fresh fruit and fruit juice started at a lower level but gradually increased over time. By the early 2000s, fresh fruit consumption outpaced that of fresh vegetables, suggesting a shift towards a greater emphasis on fruit in the diet.
In conclusion, the line charts depict changes in food consumption habits in the UK from 1942 to 2005. Milk consumption experienced a downward trend, with total milk and cream being the most consumed type throughout the period. The popularity of skimmed milk rose significantly, while fresh vegetable intake declined steadily. Conversely, the consumption of fresh fruit and fruit juice exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, eventually surpassing fresh vegetables in the early 21st century.
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 73
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 73
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 965.302439024 198% => OK
No of words: 355.0 196.424390244 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37746478873 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82014461186 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476056338028 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 283.868780488 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9912549284 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745736441001 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318945714624 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451167259998 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501764484767 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329781365536 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.