The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
Given in the line graph is the illustration of how much 3 types of spread were consumed over a 26-year period between 1981 and 2007. In addition, all the units are measured in grams.
Overall, what is striking from the graph is that low fat and reduced spreads saw a dramatic increase, while the others went down over the time period covered by the graph. At the beginning of the period, butter was the most popular spread, which was replaced by margarine from 1991 to 2001, and following this, low fat and reduced spreads became the most widely used spread in the final years.
In 1981, the amount of butter and margarine started at 140 and about 85 grams respectively. Following this, the figure for butter increased and then significantly went down to 100 in 1991, but the opposite pattern was true for the figure for maragine, which is equal to that for butter in 1991. After 1991, butter and margarine traded places, after which they gradually declined to under 60 grams in 2007.
On the other hand, having only begun in 1996 at about 10, the figure for low fat and reduced spreads then witnessed a rapid rise to peak at over 80. Eventually, the figure steadily dropped to about 65 at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | roadtoapro | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show information about the top five supermarkets in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5871559633 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30271574224 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4244861377 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177778210195 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736460174467 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762117916684 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112464577203 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782008109373 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.